By Barry Rubin
Update: Sp in other words, don't believe the Palestinian denials they are going to talk, believe Kerru's claim to the contrary! How absurd. They just don't get it and won't take 'no' for an answer because Kerry knows better for Israelis and Palestinians than their leaders do. When will his credibility crack: He has nothing. Meanwhile, while these games are going on there is no U.S. policy on Egypt or Syria!
Secretary of State John Kerry announced officially the restart of negotiations and--as I predicted--neither the Palestinians nor Israel had actually agreed! What an embarrassment! This is the foreign policy of the United States, people, not tbe yacht races, people. This makes America look ridiculous and not credible, isn't that clear?
The Palestinian Authority (PA) has no intention of making
peace. It only wants to get concessions and blame Israel for an absence of
peace. It knows that the Obama Administration will never punish it if it balks
but probably will only offer it more.
The PA doesn’t want to make peace since any actual
concessions will make it appear to be a traitor and will bring a counter-offensive
from Hamas. Since it doesn’t even represent the territory it claims—it has no
power over the Gaza Strip and has no prospect of getting any—the PA cannot make
any binding commitment at all. And it is watching as the battle for Syria is
going on next door. That would give it a radical neighbor—the United States is supporting
it—which will deem a peace agreement as null and void.
Every PA negotiator knows well that he isn’t supposed to succeed.
It is only Kerry who doesn’t know this.
As for Israel, the government of Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu knows that it cannot depend on the United States. For example, the key
issue is supposedly the precondition of what the borders will be. Now think
this one through:
The PA demands and must demand that the 1967 lines would be
the state borders. BUT the United States on two occasions, in the George Bush
administration and in later 2010—told Israel that it could keep “settlement
blocs,” that is large settlements along the borders. It is thus impossible that
Netanyahu would agree to accept the loss of that U.S. commitment.
Why should he not get something for nothing, show that the
president’s past commitment was worthless, and simultaneously know that any
time the PA wants more that Obama will give it to them?
And of course his coalition—even his own party—won’t agree.
Does Israel so desperately need “peace” that it must be purchased at its
reduced security?
Meanwhile what is the United
States doing for Israel on Egypt (still refusing recognizing the military
regime in Egypt), Lebanon (not keeping the 2006 commitment to combat Hizballah);
Syria (pushing weapons on Islamists which Israel will have to confront in future);
the Gaza Strip (having no policy to bring down Hamas); Iran (no serious plan
for denying nuclear weapons), and Turkey (letting Ankara ignore the supposed détente
even though it was promised by Obama himself)?
And that’s not even mentioning the
demand for millions of Palestinian Arabs to “return” to Israel or Jerusalem?
There is nothing for Israel in
this except the promise of peace, which will evaporate as ever single Obama
promise has also done.
So the point is this:
The PA will keep doing stalling
tactics and come up with new preconditions that it hopes Israel will not meet.
Israel will keep giving minor concessions
and engaging in stalling tactics to hope that Kerry finds something useful to
do.
Kerry will keep rotating between
shuttle diplomacy and his yacht until the media has tired of this game.
The
Ring of Kerry in Ireland is one of the most beautiful places in the world. Now the Middle East has its own.
All leaks, spins, false claims,
and ploys will go nowhere.
Advice: Don’t read about the latest
double-talk and impending supposed breakthroughs in the media. Look at underlying
interests; not imaginative headlines.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.