By
Barry Rubin
The Washington
Post has an article by Michael Gerson attacking Newt Gingrich’s warning that the
imposition of Sharia law is a tremendous danger to U.S. interests. I’m only
interested here in how the article reveals an element of Gerson’s worldview.
(Don't miss the really cool observation at the end of this article.)
Gerson
writes:
“Gingrich
joins Iranian clerics, Taliban leaders and Salafists of various stripes in
believing that the most authentic expression of sharia law is fundamentalism and
despotism.”
So
who is going to determine the “authentic expression” of Sharia law? Gerson?
The Washington Post? The clerics most liked by Washington Post writers
regardless of the size of their following? You can't create some ideal Sharia
law and then say that there's nothing to worry about.
For
all practical purposes, though, Islam and Sharia are going to be defined not by
theories, debates by non-Muslims over theology, comparative readings of original
texts, or your preferences. You, especially a non-Muslim, cannot "figure out"
what Islam "really" is. All of that is irrelevant. Islam (and Sharia) will be
defined by who has power as the actual political and religious leaders of
Muslims. If moderates were running things--and it makes no difference whether
you think Islam is a "religion of peace" or an inevitably aggressive
ideology--then Islam would be moderate. And if revolutionary Islamists are
running the countries, providing the most influential imams, and controlling the
mosques, Islam will be radical.
The
ideas that being critical of Islam as actually practiced is "Islamophobia" or
that the West should understand that Islam is just great are equally fallacious.
The idea that Islam "must" be radical is irrelevant.
What
counts is the reality. Here's the reality: about 250 million people are going to
be living in what basically are Islamist states in the Middle East, even if
there are a few small compromises. Millions of people watch and listen to people
like Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Brotherhood’s radical guru. How many followers do
Gerson’s moderate guys who want to reform Islam have?
What's
important is that any Islam defined and controlled by Hamas, Hizballah, the
Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaida, or the Taliban is going to be radical and anyone
who is really moderate will have to shut up, flee, change sides, be murdered,
marginalized, or get thrown into prison.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.