"I
shot the sheriff
But
I didn't shoot no deputy." --Bob Marley
By
Barry Rubin
At his rare December 8 press conference, President Barack Obama took two questions
on the Middle East. His answers give a sense of how he’s going to campaign on
the issue. Both answers are deeply flawed but one wonders how many people will
understand that.
To
paraphrase the song, Obama will say: I shot ben-Ladin, and I also wounded
Iran.
The
way his election rivals should put it is:
You--or
more accurately courageous U.S. soldiers--may have shot the sheriff but you
have been helping turn over several countries with tens of millions of people to
the far more dangerous deputy. He and his men are terrorizing the townspeople
who you keep criticizing them for trying to defend themselves.
Or,
let me put it boldly:
Think
about this: In the year 2012 the overwhelming majority of Muslims in the Middle
East will be governed by radical Islamist regimes that believe in waging jihad
on Israel and America, wiping Israel off the map, suppressing Christians,
reducing the status of women even more than it is now, and their right as true
interpreters of God's will to govern as dictators. (Egypt, Gaza Strip,
Iran, Lebanon, Libya, Tunisia, and Turkey)
Now
compare that to a few thousand al-Qaida guys running around and staging
occasional terror attacks.
Back
to the press conference. A reporter asked Obama:
“Republican
candidates have taken aim at your approach to foreign policy, particularly the
Middle East and Israel, and accused you of appeasement. I wanted to get your
reaction to that.”
I
think that the concept of “appeasement” is not so useful here and is easy for
Obama and his supporters to dismiss. Appeasement is to try to make a strong
force that you fear leave you alone and not hurt you by making concessions to
them.
What
the Obama Administration has done goes far beyond that.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.